Editorial Team

 Segretario di redazione: Fabrizia Gianni 

 Direttore responsabile: Luciano Luciani

 Redazione: Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio via Roma, 103 -56011- Calci (Pi)

Sandra Bocelli doc. Sc. Nat. Pisa 

Francesca Civile doc. Lettere Pisa 

 Brunella Danesi doc. Sc. Nat. Pistoia 

 Isabella Marini doc. Sc. Nat. Pisa 

 Amministrazione: ETS piazza Carrara - Pisa fax 06233238204

 Stampa: ETS - Pisa

 Collaboratori

Maria Arcà Centro studi Ac. Nucleici CNR Roma 
Maria Bellucci doc. St. Fil. L. Sc. Copernico Prato 

Claudia Binelli doc. Sc. Nat. Torino 

Marcello Buiatti doc. Genetica Università di Firenze

Luciana Bussotti doc. Sc. Nat. Livorno 

Stefania Consigliere dip. Antropologia Univ. Genova 

Luciano Cozzi doc. Sc. Nat. Milano 

Tomaso Di Fraia doc. Archeologia Univ. Pisa 

Elio Fabri doc. Astronomia Università di Pisa 

Tiziano Gorini doc. Lettere Ist. Sup. Livorno 

 

Alessandra Magistrelli doc. Sc. Nat. Roma 

Piergiacomo Pagano ENEA Bologna 

Marco Piccolino doc. Fisiol. e St. Scienza Università di Ferrara 

Giorgio Porrotto cultore di politiche scolastiche Roma

Laura Sbrana doc. Lettere 

Marco Tongiorgi doc. Stratigrafia Università di Pisa 

Marco A. L. Zuffi Erpetologo Museo St. nat.'Università Pisa

For the editorial production process, Naturalmente Scienza relies on three different bodies: the Editorial Board, the Editorial Committee and the Scientific Committee. The editors are responsible for the entire editorial process, the transparency of the publication methods and the composition of the issue summaries. As stated in the Code of Ethics, the Editorial Board ensures that all those involved in the review and production process fulfil their obligations. Editors are responsible for the initial evaluation of submissions, which are judged on the completeness of the material provided, scientific integrity, and compatibility with the journal's scientific objectives. Only the Editors can decide whether to initiate the review process, to skip it (in very rare cases, due to the author's exceptional prestige), or to reject the proposal ex officio. The Editors liaise with the Editorial Board to ensure a transparent review process, linguistic appropriateness of submissions, and compliance with the journal's editorial standards. Members of the Editorial Board may not be involved in the peer review process as reviewers, except in rare cases where such members are considered to be the foremost experts on a particular topic. The Editors liaise with the Editorial Board to ensure a transparent review process, linguistic appropriateness of submissions, and adherence to the journal's editorial standards. Editorial Board members may not be involved in the peer review process as reviewers, except in rare cases where such members are considered to be the foremost experts on a particular topic. In such cases, which the Editors and the Editorial Board are committed to limiting, the other members of the Editorial Board will manage the communication with the author(s), protecting their identity and that of the reviewer; if the proposal is published, any coincidence will be stated on the first page of the paginated article. Its members are never involved in the editorial process of the issues. If they are asked to act as anonymous reviewers, the Editorial Board exercises its function as in other cases.