A Contribution to the Pasteur-Pouchet Controversy
Pouchet as a philosopher and historian of the natural sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/mefisto.7-2.862Parole chiave:
Pasteur, Pouchet, spontaneous generation, controversy, SSKAbstract
Building upon Raynaud’s analysis of the controversy between Pasteur and Pouchet over spontaneous generation, I single out the philosophical and historical reasons which led Pouchet to defend the idea that life can appear in the absence of parents. In particular, I retrace the theological arguments used by Pouchet for showing that spontaneous generation copes with the Christian doctrine. Then, I provide an outline of Pouchet’s interpretation of the development of natural sciences in the Middle Ages. Finally, I argue that Pouchet’s endorsement to spontaneous generation was determined by his looking upon Albert the Great’s philosophical and scientific heritage as a combination of both theological orthodoxy and experimental attitude, a mix that satisfies the metaphysical and epistemological tenets of Pouchet’s philosophy of the natural sciences.
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Gli articoli pubblicati sono sotto il copyright dell’editore. “© Edizioni ETS” apparirà nelle pagine editoriali della rivista.
Cinque anni dopo la pubblicazione i contributi sono posti sotto licenza Creati Commons tipo “Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0” (CC BY-SA 4.0), e conservati sul sito della rivista. Tutti i diritti tornano all'autore/autrice.