A Contribution to the Pasteur-Pouchet Controversy
Pouchet as a philosopher and historian of the natural sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/mefisto.7-2.862Keywords:
Pasteur, Pouchet, spontaneous generation, controversy, SSKAbstract
Building upon Raynaud’s analysis of the controversy between Pasteur and Pouchet over spontaneous generation, I single out the philosophical and historical reasons which led Pouchet to defend the idea that life can appear in the absence of parents. In particular, I retrace the theological arguments used by Pouchet for showing that spontaneous generation copes with the Christian doctrine. Then, I provide an outline of Pouchet’s interpretation of the development of natural sciences in the Middle Ages. Finally, I argue that Pouchet’s endorsement to spontaneous generation was determined by his looking upon Albert the Great’s philosophical and scientific heritage as a combination of both theological orthodoxy and experimental attitude, a mix that satisfies the metaphysical and epistemological tenets of Pouchet’s philosophy of the natural sciences.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Published articles remain under the Publisher’s copyright for five years, that is © Edizioni ETS
Five years after publication, the article is released under a CC BY SA 4.0 license and kept on the journal website. All rights revert to the author.