First Replies to Criticisms on "Teoría analítica del derecho"

Authors

  • Jorge L. Rodríguez Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4454/analisiediritto.v22i1.447

Keywords:

Deontic logic, Normativity, Applicability, Social Rules, nterpretation, Analytic Philosophy, Interpretation

Abstract

In this essay I try to offer a first response to some critical comments to my book Teoría analítica del derecho (hereinafter TAD). I discuss with Ratti about deontic logic, with Moreso about the normativity of law and the scope of a positivistic theory, with Navarro about the applicability of legal norms, with Scavuzzo and Figueroa about social rules and the rule of recognition, with Comanducci about the degrees of indeterminacy of law, with Guastini on the characterization of legal positivism, normative hierarchies, power-conferring rules, and interpretation, and with Barberis on the relevance of an analytical approach in legal philosophy.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-28

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Analytical Theory of Law. A debate

License

Copyrights are transferred for five years starting publication date from the author(s) to the Publisher. After this period, the content is released under a Creative Commons licence (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International).